Pandemic, ignorance and avoidable suffering

e202210068

Authors

Keywords:

Political Theory, Agnotology, Pandemics, Political Epistemology, Experience of Harm, Epistemic injustice, Uncertainty and politics

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemics gave us relevant lessons that are going to leave a durable mark in our individual and collective experience. Those lessons are both practical and endowed with a moral import. But the pandemic has left a trail of experiences poorly elaborated that leads, with some urgency, to forced silence and to the cancellation of emotional trauma. The aim of this paper was to disentangle the complex relationship that arises, under conditions of uncertainty, between knowledge and ignorance, both from the perspective of experts and of policy makers, and even of the ordinary people, struck or not by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. To that end, I distinguish between three different levels of analysis (agency, institutions, and ideological frameworks) so to argue that the mismatches that occur in all of them, and between them, are sources of avoidable harm. The purpose of this exploration was, therefore, to bring to the floor, relying on the conceptual tools of the political epistemology, both the aspects of the traumatic experience that still lack an adequate elaboration and the features that provide an improved resilience for individuals and societies in tackling with the frightful consequences of the pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Riva G. Il più crudele dei mesi. Storia di 188 vite. Milano: Mondadori; 2022:17.

Ortega Lozano R, Monasterio Astobiza A, Rodríguez-Arias D. La ética de los nudges sanitarios: una discusión sobre su aceptabilidad en salud pública. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2022; 96: 5 de octubre e202210062. Cf. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale UP;2008.

Aristóteles, Retórica, 1359.

Proctor R, Shiebinger L (eds). Agnotology. The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford: Stanford UP; 2008. Groos M, McGoey L (eds). Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. London & New York: Routledge; 2015.

Morozov E. To Save Everything, Click Here. The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PubblicAffairs;2013.

Elster J. Solomonic Judgements. Studies in the Limitations of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge UP;1989: 17.

Greppi A, Triviño Caballero R. Injusticia epistémica e ignorancia institucional. Las Torres de Lucca: revista internacional de filosofía política (2021) 19:15-28; en referencia a Fricker M. Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford UP;2009.

Broncano F. Conocimiento expropiado. Epistemología política en una democracia radical. Barcelona: Akal;2020.

Gheaus A. Personal Relationship Goods. En: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Disponible en: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/personal-relationship-goods/

Medina J. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppresion, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford: Oxford UP; 2012.

Greppi A. Practical authority and epistemic authority: comity, expertise and public understanding. Jurisprudence (2020) 11:437-455.

Anderson E. Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony. Episteme (2011) 2:144-164.

Published

2022-10-05

How to Cite

1.
Greppi A. Pandemic, ignorance and avoidable suffering: e202210068. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2022 Oct. 5 [cited 2025 Jun. 7];96:12 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/252

Issue

Section

Colaboraciones especiales

Categories