Back pain prevention through the correct allocation of school furniture: validation of two instruments
e202109117
Keywords:
Education, Schools, Ergonomics, Anthropometry, Validation, MismatchAbstract
Background: At school age pain in the lower back is common. There is evidence that an adequate fit between the dimensions of the school furniture and the anthropometric characteristics will result in an improvement in their posture and a reduction in pain. The objectives of this research were to determine the degree of mismatch of furniture in primary education, check if the sizes of the current regulations are adequate and validate two instruments that allow teachers to correctly assign furniture.
Methods: 92 elementary students participated. Measurements to determine the ideal height of the chair and table were made with an anthropometer in a Galician public school in 2019. The recorded values were compared with those obtained by the two measurement instruments to be validated: TAIS and TAIM. The analysis techniques used were: descriptive, one-way ANOVA, t-test and effect size, significance level ρ<0.05.
Results: The mismatch between the furniture used in the classrooms and that calculated as ideal was 93.5% for chairs and 97.6% for tables. In 51% of cases they needed different chair and table sizes. The correlational analysis of the instruments to be validated showed an r=0.994 in the chair and r=0.99 in the table.
Conclusions: The level of mismatch between the furniture and the anthropometric dimensions of the students was high. A reorganization of the sizes in the classroom is necessary, being able to follow the European size regulations and using furniture allocation instruments such as those proposed for their high level of correlation.
Downloads
References
Delgado JÁG, Lara GV, Torres J del CM, Morales IP. Epidemiología del dolor de espalda bajo. Investig Medicoquirúrgicas. 2014;6(1):112-125. Disponible en: http://www.revcimeq.sld.cu/index.php/imq/article/view/275. Accessed April 10, 2020.
Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO, Manniche C. The course of low back pain from adolescence to adulthood: Eight-year follow-up of 9600 twins. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(4):468-472. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000199958.04073.d9
Calvo-Muñoz I, Kovacs FM, Roqué M, Fernández IG, Calvo JS. Risk Factors for Low Back Pain in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(5):468-484. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000558
Jeffries LJ, Milanese SF, Grimmer-Somers KA. Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain: A systematic overview of the research literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(23):2630-2637. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158d70b
Panagiotopoulou G, Christoulas K, Papanckolaou A, Mandroukas K, Papanickolaou A, Mandroukas K. Classroom Furniture Dimensions and Anthropometric Measures in Primary School. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(2):121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.002
Kovacs FM, Gestoso M, Gil Del Real MT, López J, Mufraggi N, Méndez JI. Risk factors for non-specific low back pain in schoolchildren and their parents: A population based study. Pain. 2003;103(3):259-268. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00454-2
Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JFM, de Bruin R, Viviani C. The influence of school furniture on students’ performance and physical responses: results of a systematic review. Ergonomics. 2016;60(1):93-110. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1170889
Parcells C, Stommel M, Hubbard RP. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: Empirical findings and health implications. J Adolesc Heal. 1999;24(4):265-273. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00113-X
García-Molina C. Guía de Recomendaciones Para El Diseño Del Mobiliario Ergonómico. Valencia: Instituto biomecánica de Valencia; 1992.
Cardon G, De Clercq D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Breithecker D. Sitting habits in elementary schoolchildren: A traditional versus a “Moving school.” Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54(2):133-142. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00215-5
CEN. Furniture - Chairs and Tables for Educational Institutions - Part 1: Functional Dimensions. European Union: CEN (European Committee for Standadization); 2015.
Macedo AC, Morais A V., Martins HF, Martins JC, Pais SM, Mayan OS. Match between classroom dimensions and students’ anthropometry: Re-equipment according to european educational furniture standard. Hum Factors. 2015;57(1):48-60. doi: 10.1177/0018720814533991
Gouvali MK, Boudolos K. Match between school furniture dimensions and children’s anthropometry. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(6):765-773. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009
Quintana Aparicio E, Martín Nogueras A, Orejuela Rodríguez J, Romero González J, Sánchez Pedraz L, Díez García R. Estudio del mobiliario escolar en una población infantil. Fisioterapia. 2004;26(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/s0211-5638(04)73077-1
Xunta-de-Galicia. Equipamento de centros: catálogos xerais. Conselleria de Educación, Universidade e Formación Profesional. https://www.edu.xunta.gal/portal/node/495. Published 2017. Accessed March 1, 2021.
Sánchez González E, Carrascosa Lezcano A, Fernández García JM, Ferrández Longás A, López De Lara D, López-Siguero JP. Estudios españoles de crecimiento: situación actual, utilidad y recomendaciones de uso. An Pediatr. 2011;74(3). doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2010.10.005
Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JFM. Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(4):1123-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.012
Molenbroek JFM, Kroon-Ramaekers YMT, Snijders CJ. Revision of the design of a standard for the dimensions of school furniture. Ergonomics. 2003;46(7):681-694. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000085635
Milanese S, Grimmer K. School furniture and the user population: An anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics. 2004;47(4):416-426. doi: 10.1080/0014013032000157841
Madriz-Quirós C, Ramírez-Coretti A, Serrano R. Estudio antropométrico para el diseño de mobiliario para niños de edad escolar en Costa Rica. Tecnol en Marcha. 2008;21(4):17-28. https://revistas.tec.ac.cr/index.php/tec_marcha/article/view/221
Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2016 Update. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36:1121-1124. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565186
Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JFM, Viviani C. The effect of secular trends in the classroom furniture mismatch: support for continuous update of school furniture standards. Ergonomics. 2015;58(3):524-534. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.978900
ISO. ISO 15535: General Requirements for Establishing Anthropometric Databases. Int Organ Stand. 2012.
Carrascosa A. Aceleración secular de crecimiento en España. Estudios Españoles de Crecimiento 2010. Población autóctona y población inmigrante. Endocrinol y Nutr. 2014;61(5):229-233. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2014.03.004
Agha SR. School furniture match to students’ anthropometry in the Gaza Strip. Ergonomics. 2010;53(3):344-354. doi: 10.1080/00140130903398366
Castellucci HI, Catalán M, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JFM. Evaluation of the match between anthropometric measures and school furniture dimensions in Chile. Work. 2016;53(3):585-595. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152233
Brewer JM, Davis KG, Dunning KK, Succop PA. Does ergonomic mismatch at school impact pain in school children? Work. 2009;34(4):455-464. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0946
Lee Y, Yun MH. Evaluation of the guidelines and children’s ability to select the anthropometrically recommendable height of school furniture: A case study of Korean primary school children. Work. 2019;64(3):427-438. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193005
Yanto, Lu CW, Lu JM. Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for elementary school furniture based on children’s anthropometry. Appl Ergon. 2017;62:168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.004
Cantin N, Delisle I, Baillargeon M. Reducing Child-Furniture Incompatibility in Primary Schools. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2019;12(2):200-209. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2018.1538843
Kane PJ, Pilcher M, Legg SJ. Development of a furniture system to match student needs in New Zealand schools. In: 16th World Congress on Ergonomics. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2006:1531–1536.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Adrián Paramés González, Alfonso Gutiérrez Santiago, Jesús Antonio Gutiérrez Santiago, Iván Prieto Lage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
SinDerivadas — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuir el material modificado.
No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.
Avisos:
No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material en el dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
No se dan garantías. La licencia podría no darle todos los permisos que necesita para el uso que tenga previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como publicidad, privacidad, o derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utilice el material.
