Attitudes and social images regarding colorectal cancer screening. An exploratory approach through discussion groups

e202308063

Authors

Keywords:

Colorectal cancer, Screening, Hidden Blood Test, Health programs, Early detection, Population attitudes

Abstract

BACKGROUND // The screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) through the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has achieved high implementation in Spain, although participation rates are still not optimal. At the same time, available data show significant differences in participation both among autonomous communities and among different sociodemographic groups, which raises various equity issues. This study aimed to conduct an exploratory analysis from a qualitative perspective on the attitudes, perceptions, and social images that the target population for colorectal cancer screenings holded regarding them, as well as the barriers and areas for improvement identified through these.
METHODS // This study was designed using a qualitative research approach, through the conduct of four focus groups in May 2022, with a total of twenty-six participants (equal number of men and women) aged fifty to sixty-nine years. The participants were residents of the Community of Madrid, Catalonia, Andalusia, and the Basque Country (in both large and small cities), with varying educational levels and different previous experiences of participation in the CRC screening program.
RESULTS // Different conceptualizations of prevention were identified, but none that encompassed cancer (especially colorectal cancer) as an element to be incorporated into daily practices since its occurrence is primarily associated with chance. In addition to the lack of knowledge about CRC compared to other types of cancer (such as breast or prostate cancer), various attitudinal barriers to participation in the CRC screening program were perceived. These included the rejection of being part of the older age group (targeted by the test), fear of waiting for the results, lack of reliability, or the sense of being able to postpone the moment.
CONCLUSIONS // This study highlights the need for interventions aimed at promoting the attitude with which the invitation to participate is received and interpreted. It also emphasizes the importance of incorporating colon cancer into the dominant framework of concerns, raising awareness about the significance of early detection, and addressing potential sources of inequity. These interventions should address the broader conceptualization of the role of prevention observed among individuals with higher cultural capital and the greater normalization of screening programs found among women due to their previous experience with breast cancer screening.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Observatorio del cáncer de la Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer [Internet]. [Consultado 21 de marzo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://observatorio.contraelcancer.es/

Marzo-Castillejo M, Vela-Vallespín C, Bellas-Beceiro B, Bartolomé-Moreno C, Melús-Palazón E, Vilarrubí-Estrella M et al. Recomendaciones de prevención del cáncer. Actualización PAPPS 2018. Aten Primaria. 1 de mayo de 2018;50:41-65.

Helsingen LM, Kalager M. Colorectal Cancer Screening - Approach, Evidence, and Future Directions. Hardin CC, editor. NEJM Evid [Internet]. 9 de enero de 2022 [consultado 29 de marzo de 2023];1(1). Disponible en: https://evidence.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/EVIDra2100035

Jodal HC, Helsingen LM, Anderson JC, Lytvyn L, Vandvik PO, Emilsson L. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. octubre de 2019;9(10):e032773.

Gini A, Jansen EEL, Zielonke N, Meester RGS, Senore C, Anttila A et al. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer. marzo de 2020;127:224-235.

Lauby-Secretan B, Vilahur N, Bianchini F, Guha N, Straif K. The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 3 de mayo de 2018;378(18):1734-1740.

Molina Barceló A, Moreno Salas J, Peiró Pérez R, Arroyo Fernández G, Ibáñez Cabanell J, Vanaclocha Espí M et al. Desigualdades de acceso a los programas de cribado del cáncer en España y cómo reducirlas: Datos de 2013 y 2020. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2021;(95):138.

Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Estrategia en Cáncer del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Actualización aprobada por el Consejo Interterritorial del Nacional de Salud, el 29 de octubre de 2009.

Boletín Oficial del Estado. Orden SSI/2065/2014, de 31 de octubre, por la que se modifican los anexos I, II y III del Real Decreto 1030/2006, de 15 de septiembre, por el que se establece la cartera de servicios comunes del Sistema Nacional de Salud y el procedimiento para su actualización [Internet]. Sec. 1, Orden SSI/2065/2014 nov 6, 2014 p. 91369-91382. Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2014/10/31/ssi2065

Knudsen AB, Zauber AG, Rutter CM, Naber SK, Doria-Rose VP, Pabiniak C et al. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 21 de junio de 2016;315(23):2595-2609.

European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group, von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, Atkin W, Halloran S et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):51-59.

Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Estrategia en Cáncer del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Actualización aprobada por el Consejo Interterritorial del Nacional de Salud, 2021.

Red de Programas de Cribado de Cáncer. Vigilancia de polipectomías en el cribado de cáncer de colon y recto. Noviembre, 2021. [Internet]. Red de Programas de Cribado de Cáncer. [Consultado 21 de marzo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://cribadocancer.es/

INEbase / Sociedad / Salud / Encuesta europea de salud en España / Resultados [Internet]. INE. [Consultado 9 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176784&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573175

García M, Borràs JM, Milà N, Espinàs JA, Binefa G, Fernández E et al. Factors associated with initial participation in a population-based screening for colorectal cancer in Catalonia, Spain: A mixed-methods study. Prev Med. 2 de febrero de 2011;S0091743511000405.

Frederiksen BL, Jørgensen T, Brasso K, Holten I, Osler M. Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening. Br J Cancer. 9 de noviembre de 2010;103(10):1496-1501.

Javanparast S, Ward P, Young G, Wilson C, Carter S, Misan G et al. How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Prev Med. abril de 2010;50(4):165-172.

Molina-Barceló A, Salas Trejo D, Peiró-Pérez R, Málaga López A. To participate or not? Giving voice to gender and socio-economic differences in colorectal cancer screening programmes. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). septiembre de 2011;20(5):669-678.

Palmer CK, Thomas MC, Von Wagner C, Raine R. Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study. Br J Cancer. 2 de abril de 2014;110(7):1705-1711.

Hurtado JL, Bacigalupe A, Calvo M, Esnaola S, Mendizabal N, Portillo I et al. Social inequalities in a population based colorectal cancer screening programme in the Basque Country. BMC Public Health. 5 de octubre de 2015;15:1021.

Navarro M, Nicolas A, Ferrandez A, Lanas A. Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(20):3632.

Conde Gutiérrez del Álamo F. Análisis sociológico del sistema de discursos [Internet]. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS); 2010 [consultado 10 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=426635

Binefa G, García M, Peiró R, Molina-Barceló A, Ibáñez R. Cómo evaluar y reducir desigualdades sociales en los programas de cribado de cáncer. Gac Sanit. Mayo de 2016;30(3):232-234.

Bridou M, Aguerre C, Gimenes G, Kubiszewski V, Le Gall A, Potard C et al. Psychological barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening: a French qualitative study. Health Psychol Res. 10 de junio de 2013;1(2):22.

Hall NJ, Rubin GP, Dobson C, Weller D, Wardle J, Ritchie M et al. Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer. Health Expect. octubre de 2015;18(5):1645-1657.

Wools A, Dapper EA, de Leeuw JRJ. Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. febrero de 2016;26(1):158-168.

Vanaclocha-Espi M, Ibáñez J, Molina-Barceló A, Pérez E, Nolasco A, Font R et al. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening programs in Spain. Prev Med. diciembre de 2017;105:190-196.

Nouni-García R, Lara-López Á, Carratalá-Munuera C, Gil-Guillén VF, López-Pineda A, Orozco-Beltrán D et al. Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Spain: Results of the 2017 National Health Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 29 de abril de 2022;19(9):5460.

Published

2023-08-10

How to Cite

1.
de Haro Gázquez D, Fernández Sánchez B, Amador Muñoz ML. Attitudes and social images regarding colorectal cancer screening. An exploratory approach through discussion groups: e202308063. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 10 [cited 2025 Feb. 12];97:16 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/142