Disability status and robbery victimization in Peruvian villagers

e202403022

Authors

  • J. Jhonnel Alarco Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico; Universidad de Salamanca. Salamanca. España. / Carrera de Medicina Humana; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima. Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0481-7072
  • María José Yllanes-Palomino Carrera de Medicina Humana; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima. Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-300X

Keywords:

Disabled persons, Crime victims, Theft, Violence, Peru

Abstract

BACKGROUND // About 15% of the world’s population has some degree of disability. Violence and crime primarily affect the Latin American region, especially Peru. This study aimed to determine the association between disability status and robbery victimization in Peruvian villagers in 2017.
METHODS // A cross-sectional study of secondary data analysis from the National Specialized Victimization Survey (ENEVIC) 2017 was conducted. The independent variable was disability status, and the dependent variable was robbery victimization; in addition, confounding variables were included. Poisson regression was performed to demonstrate the association, and prevalence ratios (PR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.
RESULTS // Records of 32,199 Peruvians aged 18 years or older were included. People with disabilities were 24% less likely to be robbery victims than people without disabilities (PR=0.76; 95%CI: 0.61-0.95), adjusted for confounding variables. However, this association was only statistically significant in women, older adults, and the high socioeconomic stratum.
CONCLUSIONS // In Peru, people with disabilities are less likely to be robbery victims than people without disabilities. However, only if they are women, older adults, and come from a high socioeconomic level. In the other population groups, the probabilities of suffering this victimization would be similar between people with and without disabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. World Report on Disability 2011 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131540

2. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Perú: Caracterización de las Condiciones de Vida de la Población con Discapacidad, 2017 [Internet]. INEI; 2018. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1591/libro.pdf

3. Vilalta C, Castillo JG, Torres JA. Delitos violentos en ciudades de América Latina [Internet]. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; 2016 [consultado 20 de julio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Delitos-violentos-en-ciudades-de-Am%C3%A9rica-Latina.pdf

4. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Perú: Anuario Estadístico de Criminalidad y de Seguridad Ciudadana 2012-2018 [Internet]. 2019 [consultado 20 de julio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1691/index.html

5. Krnjacki L, Emerson E, Llewellyn G, Kavanagh AM. Prevalence and risk of violence against people with and without disabilities: findings from an Australian population-based study. Aust N Z J Public Health [Internet]. 2016;40(1):16-21. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12498

6. Hughes RB, Lund EM, Gabrielli J, Powers LE, Curry MA. Prevalence of interpersonal violence against community-living adults with disabilities: a literature review. Rehabil Psychol [Internet]. 2011;56(4):302-319. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025620

7. Dammeyer J, Chapman M. A national survey on violence and discrimination among people with disabilities. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2018;18(1):355. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5277-0

8. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Encuesta Nacional Especializada sobre Victimización-Principales Resultados 2017 [Internet]. Lima: INEI; 2018. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1540/libro.pdf

9. Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM. Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2011;11 Suppl 4:S4. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S4

10. Brisson D, Roll S. The effect of neighborhood on crime and safety: a review of the evidence. J Evid Based Soc Work [Internet]. 2012;9(4):333-350. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2010.525407

11. Admire A, Ramirez B. Violence and Disability: Experiences and Perceptions of Victimization Among Deaf People. J Interpers Violence [Internet]. 2021;36(1-2):NP1-25. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260517730564

12. Janssen I. Crime and perceptions of safety in the home neighborhood are independently associated with physical activity among 11-15 year olds. Prev Med [Internet]. 2014;66:113-117. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.016

13. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Primera Encuesta Nacional Especializada sobre discapacidad 2012 [Internet]. Lima: INEI; 2014 [consultado 21 de julio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1171/ENEDIS%202012%20-%20COMPLETO.pdf

14. Instituto Nacional de Salud. Perfil Sociodemográfico de la Población con Discapacidad, 2017 [Internet]. Lima: INEI; 2017 [consultado 21 de julio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1675/

15. Palmer M, Harley D. Models and measurement in disability: an international review. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2012;27(5):357-64. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr047

16. Amate EA, Vásquez AJ. Discapacidad: lo que todos debemos saber. Conceptos generales sobre discapacidad [Internet]. Washigton: Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud; 2006. Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/719/9275316163.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

17. Mendieta P. Perú es el segundo país con las cifras más altas de inseguridad [Internet]. Correo. 2018 [consultado 21 de julio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://diariocorreo.pe/peru/peru-segundo-pais-cifras-mas-altas-inseguridad-812496/

18. Gallo EAG, Menezes AMB, Murray J, Silva LAD da, Wehrmeister FC, Gonçalves H et al. Criminal victimization in childhood and adolescence according to official records: the Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2016;32(8):e00072915. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00072915

19. Zaykowski H, Gunter WD. Gender differences in victimization risk: exploring the role of deviant lifestyles. Violence Vict [Internet]. 2013;28(2):341-56. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00019

20. Terranova C, Bevilacqua G, Zen M, Montisci M. Crimes against the elderly in Italy, 2007-2014. J Forensic Leg Med [Internet]. 2017;50:20-27. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.06.005

21. Emerson E, Krnjacki L, Llewellyn G, Vaughan C, Kavanagh A. Perceptions of safety and exposure to violence in public places among working age adults with disabilities or long-term health conditions in the UK: cross sectional study. Public Health [Internet]. 12016;135:91-96. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.036

22. Clark CR, Kawachi I, Ryan L, Ertel K, Fay ME, Berkman LF. Perceived neighborhood safety and incident mobility disability among elders: the hazards of poverty. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2009;9:162. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-162

23. Won J, Lee C, Forjuoh SN, Ory MG. Neighborhood safety factors associated with older adults’ health-related outcomes: A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2016;165:177-86. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.024

24. Hessel P, Martínez Botero MA, Cuartas J. Acute exposure to violent neighborhood crime and depressive symptoms among older individuals in Colombia. Health Place [Internet]. 2019;59:102162. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102162

25. Carlson JA, Bracy NL, Sallis JF, Millstein RA, Saelens BE, Kerr J et al. Sociodemographic moderators of relations of neighborhood safety to physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc [Internet]. 2014;46(8):1554-1563. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000274

26. Vilca MA, Castro EBG. Efectividad de la presencia policial y serenazgo municipal sobre los hechos delictivos en hurto y robo: una aproximación a nivel municipal. Semestre Economico [Internet]. 2020;9(2):4-19. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.26867/seconomico.v9i2.384

27. Krnjacki L, Priest N, Aitken Z, Emerson E, Llewellyn G, King T et al. Disability-based discrimination and health: findings from an Australian-based population study. Aust N Z J Public Health [Internet]. 2018;42(2):172-174. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12735

28. Moscoso-Porras MG, Alvarado GF. Association between perceived discrimination and healthcare-seeking behavior in people with a disability. Disabil Health J [Internet]. 2018;11(1):93-98. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.002

29. Harrell E. Crime against persons with disabilities, 2008-2010-statistical tables [Internet]. The Office of Justice Programs. 2011 [consultado 21 de julio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/crime-against-persons-disabilities-2008-2010-statistical-tables

30. Nixon M, Thomas SDM, Daffern M, Ogloff JRP. Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a data-linkage study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol [Internet]. 2017;52(5):617-626. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1371-3

31. Fogden BC, Thomas SDM, Daffern M, Ogloff JRP. Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a case linkage study. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016;16:170. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0869-7

32. Nakkeeran N, Nakkeeran B. Disability, mental health, sexual orientation and gender identity: understanding health inequity through experience and difference. Health Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2018;16(Suppl 1):97. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0366-1

33. Temple JB, Kelaher M, Williams R. Discrimination and avoidance due to disability in Australia: evidence from a National Cross Sectional Survey. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2018;18(1):1347. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6234-7

34. Jacob US, Pillay J, Adeoye OE, Oni TK. Barriers to employment of people with intellectual disability. Work [Internet]. 2023;74(1):207-218. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211097

35. Grossman BR, Magaña S. Introduction to the special issue: Family Support of Persons with Disabilities Across the Life Course. J Fam Soc Work [Internet]. 2016;19(4):237-251. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2016.1234272

Published

2024-03-15

How to Cite

1.
Alarco JJ, Yllanes-Palomino MJ. Disability status and robbery victimization in Peruvian villagers: e202403022. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 15 [cited 2026 Oct. 20];98:14 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/394