The Spanish National Hip Fractures Registry (RNFC) and the Minimum Basic Data Set (CMBD) are useful for research on hip fractures: comparison of two registries

e202111195

Authors

  • Ángel Otero Puime Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Salud Pública y Microbiología. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid. España. / Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España.
  • Alicia Gutiérrez-Misis Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España. / Departamento de Medicina. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1257-8059
  • Daniel Toledo-Bartolomé Servicio de Admisión y Documentación Clínica. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Madrid. España.
  • Pilar Sáez-López Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España. / Unidad de Geriatría. Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón. Madrid. España. / Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera. España.
  • Paloma Gómez-Campelo Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España.
  • Cristina Ojeda-Thies Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid. España.
  • Ramón Mazzucchelli Unidad de Reumatología. Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón. Madrid. España.
  • Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España. / Servicio de Geriatría. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España.
  • Grupo de trabajo del Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera

Keywords:

Hip fractures, Aging, Clinical audit, Mortality, Process assessment, Health care, Database, Medical record linkage, Quality of health care

Abstract

Background: National hip fracture registries have been established in several countries and recent publications show that the care process has been audited inspecting the representativeness according to quality standards. The aim of this study was to analyse if the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) represents the Spanish population aged 75 and older admitted for hip fractures, and to compare its results regarding the care process with the national average, according to the National Inpatient register (Minimum Basic Dataset, CMBD).
Methods: The 2017-2018 National Minimum Basic Dataset (Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, CMBD) was used as reference. For analysis, we included 83,110 cases from the CMBD and 21,130 from the RNFC. Eight common variables of both registries were selected for comparison.
Results: No significant differences were observed in the patient-related common variables (age, sex, type of fracture and fracture side), but statistically significant differences were found in the variables describing the care process (proportion of patients operated, deceased, surgical procedures and postoperative length of stay).
Conclusions: The RNFC, designed as a convenience sample, is also representative of the population of patients aged 75 and older treated for hip fractures in Spain. However, there is a participation bias related to the professionals and the hospitals interested in voluntarily participating in a quality improvement program, which would explain the better results observed in the care process, compared to the national average as collected by the CMBD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Herrera A, Martínez AA, Ferrández L et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic hip fractures in Spain. Int Orthop 2006;30:11–4. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0026-2

Alvarez-Nebreda ML, Jiménez AB, Rodríguez P et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture in the elderly in Spain. Bone 2008;42:278–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.001

Instituto de Información Sanitaria. Estadísticas comentadas: la Atención a la Fractura de Cadera en los hospitales del SNS. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social;2010. Disponible en: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/Estadisticas_comentadas_01.pdf (Citado 30/04/2021).

Guzon-Illescas O, Perez Fernandez E, Crespí Villarias N et al. Mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture: incidence, trends, and associated factors. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:203. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1226-6

Mazzucchelli R, Pérez Fernández E, Crespí Villarias N et al. East-west gradient in hip fracture incidence in Spain: how much can we explain by following the pattern of risk factors? Arch Osteoporos 2019.14:115. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0665-3

- Prieto-Alhambra D, Reyes C, Sainz MS et al. In-hospital care, complications, and 4-month mortality following a hip or proximal femur fracture : the Spanish registry of osteoporotic femur fractures prospective cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2018;13:96. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0515-8

Siddiqui MQ, Sim L, Koh J et al. Stress levels amongst caregivers of patients with osteoporotic hip fractures-a prospective cohort study. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010;39:38–42.

Neuburger J, Currie C, Wakeman R et al. The impact of a national clinician-led audit initiative on care and mortality after hip fracture in England: an external evaluation using time trends in non-audit data. Med Care 2015;53:686–691. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000383

Sáez-López P, Brañas F, Sánchez-Hernández N et al. Hip fracture registries: utility, description,and comparison. Osteoporos Int 2017;28:1157–1166. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3834-x

Meyer AC, Hedström M, Modig K. The Swedish Hip Fracture Register and National Patient Register were valuable for research on hip fractures: comparison of two registers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;125:91-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.003

Johansen A, Golding D, Brent L et al. Using national hip fracture registries an audit databases to develop an international perspective. Injury 2017;48:2174–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.001

Fragility fracture network of the bone and joint decade (FFN), 2021. Disponible en: https://www.fragilityfracturenetwork.org (Citado 30/04/2021).

Dreinhöfe KE, Mitchell PJ, Bégué T. A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures. Injury 2018; 49(8):1393-1397. DOI: 10.1016/J.INJURY.2018.06.032

Sáez-López P, González-Montalvo JI, Ojeda-Thies C et al. Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (NHFR): a description of its objectives, methodology and implementation. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2018; 53:188–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2017.12.001

Ojeda-Thies C, Sáez-López P, Currie CT et al. Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries. Osteoporos Int 2019;30:1243-1254. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04939-2

Condorhuamán-Alvarado PY, Pareja-Sierra T et al. First proposal of quality indicators and standards and recommendations to improve the healthcare in the Spanish National Registry of Hip Fracture. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2019;54(5):257–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2019.04.001

Real Decreto 69/2015, por el que se regula el Registro de Actividad de Atención Sanitaria Especializada. BOE núm. 35, de 10 de febrero de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2015/BOE-A-2015-1235-consolidado.pdf (Citado 20/06/2021).

Spanish Ministry of Health. Specialized Care Register. Activity and results of hospitalizations in Spain 2018_ (in Spanish). Disponible en: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/RAE-CMBD_Informe_Hospitalizacion_2018.pdf (Citado 20/06/2021).

Spanish Ministry of Health CI E-10-ES (Diagnostics) 2nd Edition, 2018. Disponible en: https://eciemaps.mscbs.gob.es/ecieMaps/browser/index_10_mc_old.html. (Citado 20/06/2021).

Spanish Ministry of Health. CIE-10-ES (Procedures) 2nd Edition, 2018. Disponible en: https://eciemaps.mscbs.gob.es/ecieMaps/browser/index_10_mc_old.html. (Citado 20/06/2021).

Spanish Ministry of Health. Application form for CMBD data. Disponible en: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/estadisticas/estMinisterio/SolicitudCMBD.htm. (Citado 20/06/2021).

RNFC Annual report 2019. Madrid: IdiPaz;2020. Disponible en: http://rnfc.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Informe-Anual-RNFC-2019_digital-1.pdf. (Citado 13/07/2021).

National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) Annual Report 2019. Disponible en: https://www.nhfd.co.uk/files/2019ReportFiles/NHFD_2019_Annual_Report.pdf (Citado 13/07/2021).

Hughes AJ, Hennessy O, Brennan L, Rana A, Murphy CG. How accurate is the data provided to the Irish hip fracture database? Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188(1):13-18. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1810-5

The Management of Hip Fracture in Adults. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre. Disponible en: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/evidence/full-guideline-183081997; 2011 (Citado 06/05/2021).

Álvarez Bartolomé M. Nuevo Modelo de datos del CMBD. II Jornada técnica sobre la CIE10. Disponible en: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/sisInfSanSNS/IIJornadaCIE10/CIE10_NuevoModeloDatos.pdf; 2014 (Citado 06/05/2021).

Brodaty H, Mothakunnel A, Vel-Palumbo M et al. Influence of population versus convenience sampling on sample characteristics in studies of cognitive aging. Ann Epidemiol 2014;24(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.005

Pruchno RA, Brill JE, Shands Y et al. Convenience samples and caregiving research: how generalizable are the findings? Gerontologist. 2008;48(6):820-7. DOI: 10.1093/geront/48.6.820

Jeong M, Zhang D, Morgan JC et al. Similarities and differences in tobacco control research findings from convenience and probability samples. Ann Behav Med 2019;53(5):476-485. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay059

Published

2021-11-25 — Updated on 2021-11-25

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Otero Puime Ángel, Gutiérrez-Misis A, Toledo-Bartolomé D, Sáez-López P, Gómez-Campelo P, Ojeda-Thies C, et al. The Spanish National Hip Fractures Registry (RNFC) and the Minimum Basic Data Set (CMBD) are useful for research on hip fractures: comparison of two registries: e202111195. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 25 [cited 2025 Feb. 15];95:14 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/508

Most read articles by the same author(s)