Effectiveness of smoking cessation programs of roll-your-own tobacco smokers in Galicia
e202111146
Keywords:
Abstinence, Roll your own tobacco, Smoking cessation, Effectiveness, Manufactured tobaccoAbstract
Background: Currently in developed countries there is an increase in the consumption of roll your own tobacco, which is associated with a higher proportion of users of this form of tobacco who wish to make an attempt to quit. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of tobacco cessation interventions based on the type of tobacco consumed.
Methods: Longitudinal study of a cohort of 641 smokers recruited between 2015 and 2018 in a health area of Galicia included in smoking cessation programs, based on psychological counseling and pharmacological treatment. The characteristics and success of the intervention were evaluated in two groups: roll your own tobacco smokers (RYO) and manufactured tobacco smokers (MT). A logistic regression was performed to determine the probability of success in smoking cessation. The risk measure was the odds ratio (OR) with its 95%
confidence interval.
Results: RYO users started at a younger age and had a lower sociocultural stratum than MT users. Interventions to quit smoking in RYO users were associated with less abstinence at 4 weeks (52% MT vs 38% LT) (OR: 0.5; 95% CI 0.35-0.99; p=0.045;) and at 3 months (42% TM vs 30% TL) (OR:0.6; 95% CI 0.33-0.98; p=0.04).
Conclusions: Smoking cessation programs are less effective in short-term RYO users. There are no differences in long-term abstinence between the two groups.
Downloads
References
Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. Geneva. World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO [Consultado 28 de abril 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2017/en/
Cramer MR, Wang TW, Babb S et al. Tobacco product use and cessation indicators among adults-United States, 2018 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:1013–1019.
Young D, Borland R, Hammond D et al. Prevalence attributes of roll-your-own smokers in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15: 76–82.
Raising taxes on tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.WHO 2015.Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3.0 IGO [Consultado 28 de octubre 2020]. Disponible en: http//www.who.int/tobacco/publications/raising_taxes_on_tobacco/en/
De Granda-Orive JI, Jiménez-Ruiz CA. Algunas consideraciones sobre el tabaco de liar. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47(9):425–426.
Gilmore AB, Tavakoly B, Taylor G et al. Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market. Addiction 2013; 108:1317-1326.
Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline Executive Summary.
O’Connor RJ, Mc Neill A, Borland R et al. Smoker’s beliefs about the relative safety of other tobacco products: findings from the ITC collaboration. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9: 1033–1042.
Li J, Grigg M, Weerasekera D et al. Characteristics and quitting success of roll-your-own versus tailor-made cigarette smokers. N Z Med J 2010;123: 64–73
Jiménez-Ruiz CA, De Granda Orive JI, Solano Reina S et al. Recomendaciones para el tratamiento del tabaquismo. Arch Bronconeumol 2003;39:514-523.
Gilmore AB, Tavakoly B, Hiscock R et al. Smoking patterns in Great Britain. The rise of cheap cigarrette brands and roll our own (RYO) tobacco J Public Health 2015; 37:78-88.
Tarrazo M, Pérez Rios M, Santiago-Pérez MI et al. Cambios en el consumo de tabaco: auge del tabaco de liar e introducción de los cigarrillos electrónicos. Gac Sanit 2017; 31:204-209.
Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas Ministerio de Sanidad, Gobierno de España. Encuesta sobre el alcohol, el tabaco y otras drogas en España (EDADES) 2017. [Consultado 23 de diciembre 2020]. [Disponible en la página web: http://www.pnsd.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/sistemasInformacion/sistemaInformacion/pdf/EDADES_2017_Informe.pdf].
Laugesen M, Epton M, Framptom CM et al. Hand-rolled cigarette smoking patterns compared with factory made cigarette smoking in New Zealand men. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:194.
Filippidis FT, Driezen P, Kyriakos CN et al. Transitions from and to roll-your-own tobacco, perceptions and health beliefs among smokers: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys Eur J Public Health 2020; 30:1-8.
Bayly M ,Scollo MM, Wakefield MA. Who uses rollies? Trends in product offerings, price and use of roll-your-own tobacco in Australia. Tob Control. 2019; 28:317-324
Darral KG, Figgins JA. Roll-your-own smoke yields: theoretical and practical aspects. Tob Control. 1998; 7:168–175.
Shabab L, West R, Mc Neill A. A comparison of exposure to carcinogens among roll-your-own and factory-made cigarette smokers. Addict Biol. 2009; 14:315–320.
Shabab L, West R, Mc Neill A. The feasibility of measuring puffing behaviour in roll-your-own cigarette smokers. Tob Control. 2008; 17:17–23. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021824
Joseph S, Krebs NM, Zhu J et al. Differences in nicotine dependence, smoke exposure and consumer characteristics between smokers of machine -injected roll-your-own cigarettes and factory-made cigarettes. Drug and Alcohol Depend. 2018;187: 109-115.
Jackson SE, Shahab L, West R, Brown J. Roll-your own cigarette use and smoking cessation behavior: a cross-sectional population study in England. BMJ Open 2018;8:e025370.
Jackson SE, Shahab L, Garnett C, Brown J. Trends in and correlates of use of roll-your-own cigarettes: a population study in England 2008-2017.Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22(6):942-949.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Carlos Rábade Castedo, Cristina Pou Álvarez, Álvaro Hermida Ameijeiras, Carlos Zamarrón Sanz, Ana Estany Gestal, Lucia Ferreiro Fernández, María Elena Toubes Navarro, Nuria Rodríguez Núñez, Adriana Lama López, Luis Valdés Cuadrado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
SinDerivadas — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuir el material modificado.
No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.
Avisos:
No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material en el dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
No se dan garantías. La licencia podría no darle todos los permisos que necesita para el uso que tenga previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como publicidad, privacidad, o derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utilice el material.
