Increasing one school’s physical activity levels through a self-regulated, multifactorial intervention during recess

e202109123

Authors

Keywords:

Accelerometry, Education, School, Multi-factorial, Self-regulation, Physical activity

Abstract

Background: Research has uncovered a global pandemic of physical inactivity and schools have been signaled as possible “agents” to modify these negative scores, since all children spend many hours a day there. The aim was to evaluate if it is possible to increase the physical activity levels of a whole school using a multifactorial, self-regulated intervention program during recess.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving all the students (N= 50) of a rural public school located in northern Spain (grades 1-6). The study followed an ABA case study research design (changes in the experimentation conditions and data collection after each one: week 1 no intervention, weeks 2-3 intervention, week 4 no intervention) and mixed quantitative-qualitative methodology which included the use of accelerometers (each participant wore one during the whole school day and the school week), field notes (researcher) and focus groups (teachers). Normality tests, descriptive and inferential statistics (ANOVAs) were conducted in the quantitative data obtained, while thematic content and constant comparison analyses in the qualitative data.
Results: Quantitative results showed that there was a significant increase to 67.15 ± 13.95 minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in week 2. Boys reached significantly higher scores than girls: 72.1 ± 12.12. Unfortunately, these scores went back to almost normal in the second week of implementation of the program (58.21 ± 12.88; boys= 62.75 ± 10.86). From the joined analysis of the researcher field notes and the teachers’ focus groups 4 themes emerged: intensity change, dominance change, interactions change and self-regulation.
Conclusions: It is possible to increase the physical activity levels of a whole school with a multifactorial, self-regulated program, but it is necessary to acknowledge that novelty “wears out” to avoid losing efficacy with time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Reiner M, Niermann C, Jekauc D, Woll A. Long-term health benefits of physical activity – a systematic review of the longitudinal studies. BMV Public Health. 2013;13:1-9.

Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput J-P, Connor S, Dinh T, Duggan M et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Me. 2018;41(6, Suppl. 3):S311-327.

Aubert S, Barnes JD, Abdeta C, Nader PA, Aguilar-Farias N, Andrade DS et al. Global matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(S2):S251–S273.

Brusseau TA, Kulinna PH. An Examination on Four Traditional School Physical Activity Models on Children’s Step Counts and MVPA. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2015;86(1):88-93.

Ortega FB, Konstable K, Pasquali E, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlöf A, Mäestu J et al. Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time during Childhood, Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A cohort Study. PLos ONE. 2013;8(4):1-8.

Ryu S, Loprinzi P, Kim H, Kang M. Temporal Trends in the Association between Participation in Physical Education and Physical Activity among U.S. High School Students, 2011–2017. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(7):2357.

Seljebotn PH, Skage I, Riskedal A, Olsen M, Kvalø SE, Dyrstad SM. Physically active academic lessons and effect on physical activity and aerobic fitness. The Active School study: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Reports. 2019;13:183-188

Kuan G, Rizal H, Hajar MS, Chin M-K, Mok, MMC. Bright sports, physical activity investments that work: implementing brain breaks in Malaysian primary schools. Bri J Sport Med. 2019;53:905-906.

Pastor-Vicedo J, Martínez-Martínez J, Jaén Y, Prieto-Ayuso A. Los descansos activos y la mejora de los aprendizajes en educación infantil: una propuesta de intervención. SPORT TK. 2019;8(2):67-72.

Verstraete SJ, Greet M, Cardon M, De Clercq DLR, De Bourdeaudhuij IMM. Increasing children’s physical activity levels during recess periods in elementary schools: the effects of providing game equipment. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16(4):415–419

Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ. Physical activity levels of children during school playtime. Sports Med. 2006;36(4):359–71.

Beighle A. Increasing physical activity through recess: a research brief. 2012. https://activelivingresearch.org/increasing-physical-activity-through-recess

Broekhuizen K, Scholten A-M, De Vries SI. The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children’s physical activity level: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):59.

Parrish A, Chong KH, Moriarty AL, Batterham M, Ridgers ND. Interventions to Change School Recess Activity Levels in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50:2145-2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01347-z

Reeve J. Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Edu Psychol. 2009;44:159-175.

Buff A, Reusser K, Rackozy K, Pauli C. Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: “nice to have” or something more? Learn Instr, 2011;21: 452-466.

Abula K, Beckmann J, He Z, Cheong C, Lu F, Gröpel P. Autonomy support in physical education promotes autonomous motivation towards leisure-time physical activity: evidence from a sample of Chinese college students, Health Promot Int. 2020;35(1):e1-10

Reeve J. Extrinsic rewards and inner motivations. En: Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006. p. 645-664.

Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. London: Routledge; 2011.

Freedson P, Pober D, Janz KF. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):523-530.

Blasco M, Veiga OL, Sepúlveda AR, Izquierdo-Gómez R, Román FJ, López S, Rojo M. Ambiente familiar, actividad física y sedentarismo en preadolescentes con obesidad infantil: estudio ANOBAS de casos-controles. Aten Primaria. 2020;52(4):250.257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2018.05.013

Sánchez MJ, Fernández M., Díaz JC. Técnicas e instrumentos de recolección de información: análisis y procesamiento realizado por el investigador cualitativo. Uisrael. 2021;8(1): 113-129. https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v8n1.2021.400

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum;1988.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.

Libarkin JC, Kurdziel JP. Research methodologies in science education: the qualitative-quantitative debate. J Geosci Ed. 2002;50(1):78–86.

Blanca MJ, Alarcón R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema. 2017; 29(4):552–557.

Ridgers ND, Timperio A, Crawford D, Salmon J. What factors are associated with adolescents’ school break time physical activity and sedentary time? PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56838

Published

2021-09-03

How to Cite

1.
Fernández-Rio J, Pedrero Martínez Álvaro. Increasing one school’s physical activity levels through a self-regulated, multifactorial intervention during recess : e202109123. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 3 [cited 2026 Apr. 2];95:11 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/611

Issue

Section

Originales breves

Categories