Defined daily doses in drugs with combinations of active principles: differences between three calculation methods

e202108104

Authors

  • Carles Llop Margalef Unitat de Farmàcia. Región Sanitaria Camp de Tarragona. CatSalut. Tarragona. España.
  • Dídac Llop Paredes Servei d’Epidemiologia i Prevenció del Càncer. Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus. Reus. España.
  • María Guinovart Moncunill Unitat de Farmàcia. Región Sanitaria Camp de Tarragona. CatSalut. Tarragona. España.

Keywords:

Pharmacoepidemiology, Defined daily dose, Drug therapy (combinations), Drug dosage calculations, Hypoglycemic drugs, Lung disease obstructive, Drug therapy

Abstract

Background: The defined daily dose (DDD) is a measurement unit of drug consumption associated with the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification for its use in drug utilization studies. Due to the frequent marketing of pharmaceutical specialties with active ingredients combination, the results of the calculation of DDD product in combination with several active ingredients may vary depending on various possible calculation methods. The aim of this study was to compare different ways to calculate DDD of two groups of drugs that included monodrugs as well as combined products.
Methods: From the prescription billing data during 2019 in Catalonia, the results obtained by three methods when calculating the DDDs of non-insulin hypoglycaemic drugs (nIHG) and drugs used in obstructive respiratory pathology (ORP) were compared. The three methods used were the reference calculation provided by the World Health Organization, the calculation of the considered main ingredient and the individualized calculation of all active ingredients of the combination. These methods were compared using the Wilcoxon test for paired data.
Results: The results obtained showed high differences both in the total DDD and in the percentage of participation of each pharmacological subgroup within the studied groups. Differences of 17% were observed in nIHG, and of 118% in ORP drugs. The calculation system that takes into account all the active ingredients of the combinations gives a more approximate idea of the total drug consumption, as well as the relative weight of each subgroup.
Conclusions: The calculation of all the active ingredients included in the specialties with drug combinations seems to be the one that can be most useful in pharmacoepidemiological management scenarios such as those in our environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2020. Oslo, Norway, 2019. https://www.whocc.no/ddd/definition_and_general_considera/

Llop C, Ribas J, Rovira E. Estimation of the prevalence of depression from the daily defined doses of antidepressive drugs. Med Clin (Barc) 1998 Apr 25;110(14):557-8.

Escribano-Serrano J, Paya-Giner C, Méndez Esteban MI, Márquez-Ferrando M, Zarallo-Pérez A, Michán-Doña A. Estimación de la prevalencia de hipotiroidismo según diferentes métodos: dosis diària definida, dosis diària prescrita y registro de pacientes en tratamiento. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Oct;88(5):629-38. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000500007

Vallès J, Fernández S, Cortés E, Morón A, Fondevilla E, Oliva JC, Díaz E. Comparison of the defined daily dose and days of treatment methods for evaluating the consumption of antibiòtics and antifungals in the intensive care unit. Med Intensiva. 2020 Jun-Jul;44(5):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2020. Oslo, Norway, 2019. https://www.whocc.no/ddd/list_of_ddds_combined_products/

Kallen MC, Natsch S, Opmeer BC, Hulscher MEJL, Schouten JA, Prins JM, van der Linden P. How to measure quantitative antibiòtic use in order to suport antimicrobial stewardship in acute care hospitals: a retrospective observational study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019 Feb;38(2):347-355. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3434-0

De With K, Bestehorn H, Steib-Bauert M, Kern WV. Comparison of defined versus recommended versus prescribed daily doses for measuring hospital antibiotic consumption. Infection 2009 Aug;37(4):349-52. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8138-4

Kasabova S, Hartmann M, Werner N, Käsbohrer A, Kreienbrock L. Used daily dose vs defined daily dose—Contrasting two diferent methods to measure antibiotic consumption at the farm level. Front Vet Sci. 2019 Apr 24;6:116. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00116. eCollection 2019.

Leucht S, Samara M, Heres S, Davis JM. Dose equivalents for antipsychotic drugs: The DDD method. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jul;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-4. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv167

Sweileh WM, Odeh JB, Shraim NY, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, Al-Jabi SW. Evaluation of Defined Daily Dose, percentatge of British National Formulary màximum and chlorpromazine equivalents in antipsychotic drug utilization. Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Apr;22(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

Sinnott SJ, Polinski JM, Byrne S, Gagne JJ. Measuring drug exposure: concordance between defined daily dose and days’ supply depended on drug class. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.026. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

Grimmsmann T, Himmel W. Discrepances between prescribed and defined dailiy doses: a matter of patients or drug classes? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):847-54. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1014-7

Published

2021-08-12

How to Cite

1.
Llop Margalef C, Llop Paredes D, Guinovart Moncunill M. Defined daily doses in drugs with combinations of active principles: differences between three calculation methods: e202108104. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 12 [cited 2024 Sep. 18];95:9 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/616