Perceived self-efficacy in patients after a cardiac rehabilitation programme in primary care: A new model of attention
e201907046
Keywords:
Cardiac rehabilitation, Primary care, Self-efficacy, Attention modelAbstract
Background: The literature points to the possibility of carrying out an intervention, from primary prevention to rehabilitation after a cardiac event, towards decreasing the incidence of such cardiac events and facilitating the return to daily life. The objective was to determine the effect of a cardiac rehabilitation intervention over perceived self-efficacy for patients who have suffered a cardiac event.
Methods: A community clinical trial, open, controlled, and randomised, was designed, and performed in primary care. To determine the sample size, the research team used the General Self-Efficacy Scale by Baessler and Schwarzer. The mean difference between groups considered of clinical relevance was of at least 6 points in the aforementioned General Self-Efficacy Scale. A precision of 95% and a test power of 80% were accepted. The result proposed a sample of 44 subjects in each group. Over 12 months, all subjects of legal age (N=104), both sexes, that had concluded phase II in the cardiac rehabilitation unit of the University Hospital Puerta del Mar (Cadiz) were offered to participate in the study. The patients were informed about the study development, asking for their participation and providing them with a written informed consent. The subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group through blind allocation (in a sealed envelope to the researcher), on a pre-set 2:1 ratio (two patients assigned to the intervention group to one assigned to the control group). A non-response or rejection to participate in the study record was made for the non-response analysis.
Results: A total of 89 subjects were included in the statistical analysis (response rate of 85.57%), with an average age of 63.01 years (SD: 8.75). The main dependent variable was the scores difference between groups, comparing means before and after the intervention, through the General Self-Efficacy Scale by Baessler & Schwarner. A mean difference of 6.0972 points was obtained between the intervention and the control groups (p<0.0053; 95% CI -4.1950 to -10.29), as a result of a 3.3750 mean points increase (standard deviation: 7.01) in the intervention group and a 3.3750 mean points decrease (standard deviation: 7.19) in the control group. In relation to the possible changes to be detected through the Hamilton anxiety scale and the Beck’s depression inventory, after finishing the intervention, an estimate and contrast of population means was made between groups for the scores difference in the Hamilton scale, determined on the final visit, with no significant differences found (t-student 0.1211; p<0.9 43). Similarly, no significant differences were found between the groups for the means obtained in the variable “Beck’s depression inventory scores difference” (t-student -0.1281; p<0.8987).
Conclusions: The inclusion in cardiac rehabilitation programmes carried out in primary care improves the general perceived self-efficacy of patients who have suffered cardiac events.
Downloads
References
León Latre M, Mazón Ramos P, Marcos E, et al. Temas de actualidad en prevención cardiovascular y rehabilitación cardiaca. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(Supl 1):4-13.
Berkhuysen MA, Nieuwland W, Buunk BP, et al. Change in self-efficacy during cardiac rehabilitation and the role of perceived over protectiveness. Patients Educ couns. 1999;38:21-32.
Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Normand SL, et al. Use of cardiac rehabilitation by medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 2007;116:1653-62.
Needs and priorities in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease. WHO Technical Report Series 831. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1993.
Bennet P. Psychological care of cardiac patients. En: Cardiac rehabilitation manual. Ed. Niebauer J. Speinger. London; 2011.
Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, et al. AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 update: Performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, the American College of Sports Medicine, the American Physical Therapy Association, the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, the Clinical Exercise Physiology Association, the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the Inter-American Heart Foundation, the National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:1159-67.
Bjarnason-Wehrens, Halle M. Exercise training in Cardiac Rehabilitation. En: Cardiac Rehabilitation Manual. Niebauer J Ed. Editorial Springer. 2011:89-119.
Beauchamp A, Worcester M, Ng A, et al. Attendance at cardiac rehabilitation is associated with lower all-cause mortality after 14 years of follow-up. Heart. 2012.
Sandercock GR, Cardoso F, Almodhy M. et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness changes in patients receiving comprehensive outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in the UK: a multicentre study. Heart. 2012;0:1-6.
Petrie KJ, Cameron ID, Ellis IJ, et al. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarctation: an early randomiced controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:580-6.
Balady GJ, Ades PA, Bittner VA, et al. Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 124:2951-60.
Galve E., Alegria E., Cordero A. et al.: “Temas de actualidad en cardiología: riesgo vascular y rehabilitación cardíaca”. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:203-10.
Cano de la Cuerda R, Alguacil Diego IM, Alonso Martin JJ, et al. Programas de rehabilitación cardiaca y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. Situación actual. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:72-9.
Espinosa Caliani S, Bravo Navas JC, Gómez-Doblas JJ, et al. Rehabilitación cardiaca postinfarto de miocardio en enfermos de bajo riesgo. Resultados de un programa de coordinación entre cardiología y atención primaria. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004;57:53-9.
Maroto J, Artigao R, Morales MD, et al. Rehabilitación cardiaca en pacientes con infarto de miocardio. Resultados tras 10 años de seguimiento. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005; 58:1181-7.
Pesah E, Supervia M, Turk-Adawi K, et al. A Review of Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery Around the World Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60:267-80.
Ruano-Ravina A, Pena-Gil C, Abu-Assi E, et al. Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review Int J Cardiol. 2016;15:223:436-43.
Resurrección DM, Motrico E, Rigabert A, et al. Barriers for Nonparticipation and Dropout of Women in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017;26(8):849-59.
Márquez-Calderón S, Villegas Portero R, Briones Pérez de la Blanca E, et al. Implantación y características de los programas de rehabilitación cardiaca en el Sistema Nacional de Salud español. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003;56:775–82.
De Pablo-Zarzosa C, Maroto-Montero JM, Arribas JM. Prevención y rehabilitación de la enfermedad cardiovascular: papel de la asistencia primaria. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011; 11 Supl E: 23–9.
Jolly K., Taylor R., Lip GYH, et al. Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake. Maximisation Study (BRUM). Homebased compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technology Assessment. 2007;11(35).
Denollet J, Stanislas U, Brutsaert DL. Personality and Mortality After Myocardial Infarction. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995;57:582-91.
Cossette S, Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F. Clinical implications of a reduction in psychological distress on cardiac prognosis in patients participating in a pshycological intervention program. Psychosomatic medicine. 2001;63:257-66.
Dusseldorp E, Van Elderen T, Maes S, et al. A meta-analysis of psychoeducacional programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol 1999;18:506-19.
Sitges E, Rodriguez J, Pastor MA, et al. Influencia en la autoeficacia en los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a un tratamiento de rehabilitación física. En: Nuevos horizontes en la investigación sobre la autoeficacia. Universidad Jaume I. D.I. 2014.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman. 1997.
Buceta JM, Bueno A.M. Intervención psicológica y salud: control del estrés y conductas de riesgo. Ed Dykinson. Madrid. 2001.
Baessler, J.; Schwarcer, R. Evaluación de la autoeficacia: Adaptación española de la escala de Autoeficacia General. Ansiedad Estrés 1996, 2, 1–8.
Sanjuán Suárez P, Pérez García AM, Bermúdez Moreno J. Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. Psicothema. 2000; 12(2):509-13.
Pérez Urdániz A, Rubio A, Gómez M. Cuestionario Salamanca de trastornos de Personalidad. España. 2011.
Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Brit J Med Psychol. 1959; 32:50-5.
Hamilton MC. Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Br j Psychiatry. 1969; 3:76-7.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory. Manual. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. 1996.
McDowell, K.; O’Neill, B.; Blackwood, B.; Clarke, C.; Gardner, E.; Johnston, P.; Kelly, M.; McCaffrey, J.;Mullan, B.; Murphy, S.; et al. Effectiveness of an exercise programme on physical function in patients discharged from hospital following critical illness: A randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2017, 72, 594–595, doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208723.
Restrepo Restrepo C., Vinaccia Alpi S., Quiceno JM. Resiliencia y depression. Un studio exploratorio desde la calidad de vida en la adolescencia.Suma Psicológica, Vol. 18 No 2. Diciembre 2011, 41-48. ISSN 0121-4381 ISSN-E 2145-9797.
Vinaccia S., Quiceno JM., Remor E., Resiliencia, percepción de enfermedad, creencias y afrontamiento espiritual-religioso en relación de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en enfermos crónicos colombianos. Anales de psicología, 2012. Vol 28, 2, 366-377.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Antonio José Madueño Caro, Manuel Luis Mellado Fernández, Manuel Pardos Lafarga, Marta Muñoz Ayllón, Cristina Martín-López, Juan Gómez-Salgado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
SinDerivadas — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuir el material modificado.
No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.
Avisos:
No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material en el dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
No se dan garantías. La licencia podría no darle todos los permisos que necesita para el uso que tenga previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como publicidad, privacidad, o derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utilice el material.
