Survey data as a way to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19. A pilot study in the city of Madrid

e202011159

Authors

  • Julio Carabaña Morales Departamento de Sociología Aplicada. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Madrid. España.

Keywords:

COVID-19, Health survey, Questionnaire, Representative sample, Self-report, Symptoms, Occupation, Household size, Household transmission

Abstract

Background: This research (EP-Covid19-Madrid) was inspired on the lack in the middle of March 2020 of data on COVID-19 produced from representative samples. Its goal was to evaluate the potential of interviewing such type of samples in order to assess the incidence and prevalence of epidemics as COVID-19.
Methods: The sample was of 211 households in the city of Madrid, with one informant for all household members (571). Households were selected through random generation of phone numbers, informants through sex and age quotes. A questionnaire was applied on April/3/20, with a list of symptoms and basic socio-demographic questions for the informant and a general question on COVID-19 for co-residents. Data was analyzed through cross-tabulations and logistic regression.
Results: Prevalence for individuals. On April/3/20, 10,9% of people 18 years and older living in Madrid reported symptoms compatible with COVID19 (SCC19). Occurrence of SCC19 was similar for both sexes, being respectively above and below the mean for the 40-49 (18,9%) and for the >69 (4%) age groups, showing no relation with household size, but being associated with economic activity (19% among working population) and, even more strongly, with the fact of living with symptomatic co-residents (52%). As for households, there was one member with SCC19 in 17% of households. In 8% of the households two or more members presented SSC19, in fact representing 42,9% of the people in these multiply affected households.
Conclusions. Prevalence of SSC19 was much higher than officially reported for COVID-19, although surprisingly low for people of >65. This prevalence associates with work and intra-home transmission. The inter and intra-home prevalence rates (17% and 42,9% respectively) might be useful to assess the proportion of asymptomatic carriers. These results would benefit from confirmation in larger surveys, preferably also including COVID-19 serological testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

https://novus.se/novus-coronastatus/

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Propuesta de diseño para llevar a cabo la encuesta sero-epidemiológica de la infección por sars-cov-2 en España. Disponible en: https://portalcne.isciii.es/enecovid19/informacion/ene_covid19_dis.pdf

Disponible en https://www.imop.es/data

World Health Organization (WHO), Household transmission investigation protocol for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Version 2.2, March/23/2020. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332040/WHO-2019-nCoV-HHtransmission-2020.4-eng.pdf

Mayo MG. Así se distribuye la renta por distritos. Expansión, 12-9-19. La fuente última es el INE.

Disponible en: https://metroscopia.org/prevalencia-declarada-de-la-covid-19-en-espana-4a-oleada/

Disponible en: http://w3.argos.gva.es/es/encuestas/covid-19. Oliver N, Barber X, Roomp K. The Covid19 Impact Survey: Assessing the Pulse of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain via 24 questions. arXiv:2004.01014v2 [cs.CY].

Day M. Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China figures indicate. BMJ 2020;369:m1375.

Heneghan C, Brassey J, JeffersonT. COVID-19: What proportion are asymptomatic? Entrada el 6 de Abril de 2020 en HOMECOVID-19 EVIDENCES CHOOL OF EBHC BLOG RESOURCES OUTREACH. April 6, 2020

Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(10):pii=2000180. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917. ES.2020.25.10.2000180

Nishiura H, Kobayashi T, Miyama T, Suzuki A, Jung S, Hayashi K et al. Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19). Int J Infect Dis. Published online 2020 Mar 14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.020

Streek H, Hartmann G, Exner M, Schmid M. Vorläufiges Ergebnis und Schlussfolgerungen der COVID-19 Case-Cluster-Study (Gemeinde Gangelt). https://www.land.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/zwischenergebnis_covid19_case_study_gangelt_0.pdf . Consultado 11.04.2020

Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A, Unwin HJT, Coupland H, Mellan TA et al. Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on Covid-19 in 11 European countries. r arXiv:2004.11342v1 [stat.AP].

Reher DS, Requena M, de Santis G, Esteve A, Livi-Bacci M, Padyab M, Sandström G. The COVID-19 Pandemic in an Aging World. SocArXiv. April. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/bfvxt

https://www.ine.es/jaxi/Datos.htm?path=/t20/p274/serie/prov/p04/l0/&file=01008.px#!tabs-tabla

Bayer, Christian and Kuhn, Moritz, Intergenerational Ties and Case Fatality Rates: A Cross-Country Analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13114. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3573284

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII). Estudio ENE-COVID19: Primera Ronda Estudio Nacional de Sero-Epidemiología de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en España. Informe preliminar, 13 de mayo de 2020.

Carabaña J. ¿Sueros o síntomas? Claves de Razón Práctica, 271:22-31,2020.

Published

2020-11-17

How to Cite

1.
Carabaña Morales J. Survey data as a way to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19. A pilot study in the city of Madrid: e202011159. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 17 [cited 2025 Jun. 6];94:10 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/796