Anesthesiologists’ self-reported sustainable attitudes and practices to mitigate climate change

e202512081

Authors

  • Adriana Marroquí-Calero Unidad de Anestesiología y Reanimación. Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. Málaga. España. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0168-3994
  • José Cruz Mañas Unidad de Anestesiología y Reanimación. Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. Málaga. España. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3641-3195
  • Clara Bermudez-Tamayo Departamento de Economía Aplicada. Universidad de Granada. Granada. España. / Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA. Granada. España. / CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP). España. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2964-6361

Keywords:

Healthcare personnel attitudes, Environmental pollution, Medical waste disposal, Recycling, Greenhouse gases, Climate change, Global warming, Inhalation anesthetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND // Healthcare systems are a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In hospitals, the areas with the greatest environmental impact are anesthetic-surgical practice and intensive care. The aim of the study was to identify self-reported sustainable practices and attitudes of anesthesiologists at a public university hospital, their opinion on priority practices and barriers to their implementation.

METHODS // A cross-sectional study was carried out using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire adapted from an internationally validated instrument. All anesthesiology staff at the aforementioned hospital were invited to participate. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis using prevalence ratios were used.

RESULTS // The participation rate was 71.6% (44 specialists and 4 residents). The most frequent sustainable practices were the choice of anesthetic gases according to their environmental impact and the use of prefilled drug syringes (58.3%). A total of 85.4% expressed a desire to recycle, although only 22.9% reported actually doing so.
The majority (95.8%) considered that the environmental impact of products should be taken into account; however, 52.1% indicated that their knowledge to do so was insufficient. It was observed that women were less likely to consider carbon footprint when choosing inhalation anesthetics; this effect was statistically significant. For the rest of the factors analyzed, the variations did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS // Although there is a predisposition to consider sustainable practices in Anesthesiology, their implementation is scarce. This highlights the urgency of improving the environmental training of professionals, developing multilevel strategies to facilitate individual decisions, encouraging support of decision-makers, and creating participatory environmental hospital goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Álvarez-Miño L, Taboada-Montoya R. Efectos del cambio climático en la salud pública, 2015-2020. Una revisión sistemática. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Mar;95. Disponible en: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/653

2. IPCC. Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. In: Global Warming of 15°C. Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 175-312.

3. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions Gap Report 2022. Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies [Internet]. 2022 [consultado 17 abr 2024 Apr 17]. Disponible en: https://malaysia.un.org/en/204974-emissions-gap-report-2022

4. Malik A, Lenzen M, McAlister S, McGain F. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Jan 1;2(1):e2-3.

5. Wu R. The carbon footprint of the Chinese health-care system: an environmentally extended input–output and structural path analysis study. Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Oct 1;3(10):e413-419.

6. Peiró S. The future of public health after the pandemic. A window of opportunity. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2023 May 1;46(2):e1045.

7. MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(9):e360-367.

8. Bogner J, Pipatti R, Hashimoto S, Diaz C, Mareckova K, Diaz L et al. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: Conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Waste Management and Research. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32.

9. Al-Hadithy N, Knight K, Gopfert A, Van Hove M, Villa Garcia X. Vital role of clinicians in reducing the NHS carbon footprint through smarter procurement decisions. BMJ Leader. 2023 Aug 4;

10. Park EJ, Bae J, Kim J, Yoon JU, Do W, Yoon JP et al. Reducing the carbon footprint of operating rooms through education on the effects of inhalation anesthetics on global warming: A retrospective study. Medicine (United States). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):E37256.

11. Wyssusek K, Chan K Lo, Eames G, Whately Y. Greenhouse gas reduction in anaesthesia practice: a departmental environmental strategy. BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Aug 24;11(3).

12. Ryan SM, Nielsen CJ. Global warming potential of inhaled anesthetics: Application to clinical use. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(1):92-98.

13. Sulbaek Andersen MP, Nielsen OJ, Sherman JD. Assessing the potential climate impact of anaesthetic gases. Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Jul 1;7(7):e622-629.

14. Parlamento Europeo. Reglamento (UE) 2024/573 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 7 de febrero de 2024, sobre los gases fluorados de efecto invernadero, por el que se modifica la Directiva (UE) 2019/1937, y se deroga el Reglamento (UE) nº 517/2014 [Internet]. Unión Europea; Feb 20, 2024 p. 1-67. Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=DOUE-L-2024-80236

15. Gonzalez-Pizarro P, Muret J, Brazzi L. The green anaesthesia dilemma: To which extent is it important to preserve as many drugs available as possible. Vol. 36, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2023. p. 196-201.

16. Oliver C, Charlesworth M, Pratt O, Sutton R, Metodiev Y. Anaesthetic subspecialties and sustainable healthcare: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2024;79(3):301-308.

17. Sondekoppam RV, Dexter F, Vithani S, Wong CA. Survey of anesthesia department chairs about the environmental sustain ability initiatives of their programs. J Clin Anesth. 2024;94:111378.

18. Santos P, Oliveira B, Romão C, Leiria N. A Survey on Environmental Sustainability Among Anesthesiologists: An Opportunity for Changing Behaviors. Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53367.

19. White SM, Shelton CL, Gelb AW, Lawson C, McGain F, Muret J et al. Principles of environmentally-sustainable anaesthesia: a global consensus statement from the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists. Anaesthesia. 2022 Feb 1;77(2):201-212.

20. Petre MA, Bahrey L, Levine M, van Rensburg A, Crawford M, Matava C. A national survey on attitudes and barriers on recycling and environmental sustainability efforts among Canadian anesthesiologists: an opportunity for knowledge translation. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2019 Mar 15;66(3):272-286.

21. Ard JL, Tobin K, Huncke T, Kline R, Ryan SM, Bell C. A Survey of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Regarding Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, and Organization. A A Case Rep. 2016 Apr 1;6(7):208-216.

22. McGain F, White S, Mossenson S, Kayak E, Story D. A survey of anesthesiologists’ views of operating room recycling. Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1049-1054.

23. Gray KM. From Content Knowledge to Community Change: A Review of Representations of Environmental Health Literacy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 7;15(3).

24. Köner Ö. Anesthetic Gases Do Harm to the Environment, Is It Time for a Change? Vol. 50, Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. AVES; 2022. p. 6-7.

25. Espelt A, Marí-Dell’olmo M, Penelo E, Bosque-Prous M. Estimación de la Razón de Prevalencia con distintos modelos de Regresión: Ejemplo de un estudio internacional en investigación de las adicciones. Adicciones. 2017 Jun 14;29(2):105-112.

26. Kumar N, Singh R, Jain A, Bhattacharya A. How green is my operation theater? Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct 1;8(4):493-497.

27. Tordjman M, Pernod C, Bouvet L, Lamblin A. Environmentally Sustainable Practices in the Operating Room: A French Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Anaesthesiologists and Nurse Anaesthesiologists. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Dec 1;50(6):424-429.

28. Zaw MWW, Leong KM, Xin X, Lin S, Ho C, Lie SA. The perceptions and adoption of environmentally sustainable practices among anesthesiologists-a qualitative study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2023 Mar 1;70(3):313-326.

29. Lindholm E, Hegde J, Saltnes C, Leonardsen AC, Aasheim ET. Climate change, sustainability and anesthesiology practice: A national survey among anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists in Norway. Journal of Climate Change and Health. 2023 Sep 1;13.

30. Vollmer MK, Rhee TS, Rigby M, Hofstetter D, Hill M, Schoenenberger F et al. Modern inhalation anesthetics: Potent greenhouse gases in the global atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett. 2015 Mar 16;42(5):1606-1611.

31. Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. Ley 8/2018, de 8 de octubre, de medidas frente al cambio climático y para la transición hacia un nuevo modelo energético en Andalucía. Sec. 1, Ley 8/2018 nov 7, 2018 p. 108161-201. 2018.

32. Ministerio de Sanidad Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Plan Estratégico de Salud y Medioambiente 2022-2026. 2022.

33. Ip VHY, Shelton CL, Zimmermann GL. Promoting practice change towards environmentally sustainable health care: more than meets the eye. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2023 Mar 1;70(3):295-300.

34. Xia W, Li LMW. Societal gender role beliefs moderate the pattern of gender differences in public- and private-sphere pro-environmental behaviors. J Environ Psychol. 2023 Dec 1;92.

35. Hopwood CJ, Zizer JN, Nissen AT, Dillard C, Thompkins AM, Graça J et al. Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [consultado 2025 Jul 22];14(1).

36. Yates EF, Bowder AN, Roa L, Velin L, Goodman AS, Nguyen LL et al. Empowering Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, and Obstetricians to Incorporate Environmental Sustainability in the Operating Room. Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1108-1114.

37. Red Global de hospitales Verdes y Saludables. Hospitales que curan el planeta. Edición 2023 [Internet]. [Consultado 18 abr 2024 Apr 18]. Disponible en: https://hospitalesporlasaludambiental.org/informe-hospitales-planeta-2023

38. Martínez Ruíz A, Maroño Boedo MJ, Guereca Gala A, Escontrela Rodríguez BA, Bergese SD. Emisiones Zero. Una responsabilidad compartida. Proyecto captura de gases y reciclado en el Hospital Universitario de Cruces. [Zero Emissions. A shared responsibility. Gas capture and recycling project at the Cruces University Hospital (Spain)]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023 Jan;97. Disponible en: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/81

39. Matas A. Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: Un estado de la cuestión. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa. 2018;20(1):38-47.

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

1.
Marroquí-Calero A, Cruz Mañas J, Bermudez-Tamayo C. Anesthesiologists’ self-reported sustainable attitudes and practices to mitigate climate change: e202512081. Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 4 [cited 2026 Apr. 1];99(1):17 páginas. Available from: https://ojs.sanidad.gob.es/index.php/resp/article/view/494

Most read articles by the same author(s)